<p>A sense of frustration is reflected here. So, it deserves few explication:</p>
<ul>
<li>It is imperative for the community to seek clarification from OP - it enhances the chance of receiving a meaningful answer. As long as it remains ambiguous or there is dearth of research effort, that would be unsalvagable.</li>
<li>Then comes how to ask a good question. Please check <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask">How do I ask a good question?</a>. Merely asking some programing fix wouldn't be tantamount to a good post, for example.</li>
<li>Prior asking, it is apt to check the <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/tour">scope</a> of the site.</li>
<li>A question is closed for <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions">valid reason(s)</a>. Once it is edited properly, then it would likely be reopened:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<p>Any closed question that receives one reopen vote by a user with sufficient reputation is automatically added to a reopen queue for community review. In addition, any question with significant edits that address the close reason(s) gets added to the reopen queue. If enough community members agree, the question will be reopened and can accept answers.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As it is evident, this is a community driven Q&amp;A site and not a forum. Everyone is here to help others. So, while it might be daunting a bit, it's not a point of dilemma. If the community didn't deem the post provided ample clarity or the question is not within the scope or it still lacks sufficient research, then it would face necessary action(s). And in each phase, OP does have the ability to make their posts more concise and suitable, answerable for the site.</p>
