<p>Our recent proposal for adding one more close reason <a href="https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5606/35989">was declined</a>. The reason was that we could re-use the "datasets" reason</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Questions about obtaining specific datasets are off-topic on Cross
  Validated. You are welcome to post this question to the Open Data site
  instead, thank you!</p>
</blockquote>

<p>as it is used only in 0.5% of the close reasons.</p>

<p>Should we split </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>This question appears to be off-topic because EITHER it is not about
  statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, or data
  visualization, OR it focuses on programming, debugging, or performing
  routine operations within a statistical computing platform. If the
  latter, you could try the support links we maintain.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>into two reasons while re-using the slot from "datasets" close reason?</p>

<p>What is our decision on this? I personally see no problem, but I'm curious about your opinions.</p>
