<p>Your comment touches on several generic issues. Here are some.</p>
<p>It is neither possible nor necessary that moderators <strong>understand</strong> all questions. For one, a question can be closed on the grounds that is unclear, namely that a moderator considers and/or others in the community agree that it appears unclear. Often in such cases the whole point is that people do <strong>not</strong> understand what (different) question is being asked. For another, even our widest-ranging moderators can't know in depth about everything covered by CV, and that's not the expectation.</p>
<p>More generally, a vote to close is always reversible, but there need to be specific grounds for thinking that a decision was not sound. I've looked at your question and don't see those grounds, so I support the decision to close. Many other people with enough reputation to vote to re-open like myself can consider whether they agree with the decision, and other moderators can do that too. Also, and crucially, you as OP have scope to re-edit the question and/or explain why it is not a duplicate and is also within the scope of CV.</p>
<p>What doesn't help one bit is to make general accusations without the slightest scrap of evidence beyond your own post. Statements like these are strong, but without extra evidence or detailed analysis they do not help your case or anybody else's.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>there are moderators, like those answering my question above, who take
no minimal effort to understand the question asked and label
duplicates such posts, making them invisible to other users who may
answer and help sustaining the community</p>
<p>these people answering get in the way and kill posts without
understanding them or enquiring any further.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Note that a post like yours is not invisible. It remains visible for some time, precisely to allow re-editing (which you are encouraged to do) and to allow others to consider the decision. In principle, what happened to you can be the start of a negotiation, but the onus is on you is not just to complain. You have the right to do this, but also the duty to explain precisely why the decision is wrong.</p>
