<p>Firstly, it was marked as community wiki by whuber, following which kjetil removed the status subsequently to be again marked as community wiki by whuber:</p>
<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/fsq1mm.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/fsq1mm.jpg" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>As to the aptness of the status, it is properly articulated in this old meta CV <a href="https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/a/291/362671">thread</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>... if it turns out that there truly isn't a right answer or a single answer that helps the asker, then it should be up to the asker to come back and make it a community wiki question to denote that there actually isn't a single right answer to solve the problem, but it's actually any (combination of) or all of the posted answers.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The current post in question deals with the agreement and soundness of the empirical probability, which brings into table both philosophical as well as mathematical take, as evident in the various answers it garnered.</p>
<p>There <em>might</em> be a single answer useful to OP, but the plausibility here is that all the posts are providing various outlooks and it is due to this that, imo, the question be made as community wiki and I agree with the decision.</p>
