<p>This question concerns me personally, but some parts of it might also be of general interest.</p>

<p>During the last week or so, I had been regularly reviewing first posts and late answers. Yesterday @gung told me that I should only tell users to use the self-study tag, not do it for them (I had been doing both). I acknowledged @gung's concern. (This short conversation took place via comments on my most recent post and has since been deleted.)</p>

<p>However, when I next checked the review queues, I found that I no longer had access to them. The stated reason was "Too many of your reviews were rejected". I have several comments / questions about this:</p>

<ul>
<li>After acknowledging @gung's point (which I think is very valid), I did not review any more posts. Thus it felt like I was never even given a chance to "improve my ways".</li>
<li>Is there a way I can see which of my reviews were rejected and why? (I understand from <a href="https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2517/182174">this post</a>, <a href="https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2147/182174">this post</a> and <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/moderator-tools">the overview of moderator tools</a> that some of this information is only available to user with 10k in reputation or more.)</li>
<li>Do people get banned from the review queues after hitting some threshold or do moderators manually ban them?</li>
<li>Is there a specific cool-off period after which banned users can access the review queues again or will that be at the discretion of moderators?</li>
</ul>

<p><strong>Let me add that it is not my intention to criticize the work of our tireless moderators.</strong> This site has been very helpful to me on occasion and I try to give back a bit through writing a few answers when I can and to contribute my two cents to the moderation of the site. I am happy to respond to whatever feedback I get and also to stay away from the review queues if I'm doing more harm than good.</p>
