<p>This is my first <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/68601/suggestions-for-learning-probability-and-statistics?noredirect=1#comment132666_68601">post</a> here. In a very short way I was asking for prob/stat books that are very rigorous (again, this means axioms, theorems ,proof). User  whuber  closed my question as a duplicate of this <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/421/what-book-would-you-recommend-for-non-statistician-scientists">question</a>. Now the other question is just asking for statistics books for non-statistician scientists. It does not require mathematical rigor as a condition. My question does. Thus, they are not duplicates. Because all answers that I see in the question that whuber thought was a duplicate of mine are either useless or answers that I am not able to judge if they would be answers to my own question.</p>

<p>I will copy few sentences from  some answers in the question that whuber marked as a duplicate:</p>

<p>"with concise and accurate language, but without too much mathematics"</p>

<p>"A lot of Social Science / Psychology students with minimal mathematical background like Andy Field's book: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. "</p>

<p>I request that my question is opened again.</p>

<p>Thanks for your time.</p>
