<p>Just as a specific example, can I suggest that single letter edits to two year old posts simply to change <em>correct</em> British spelling to the US equivalent are exactly the sort of thing that should be rejected out of hand?</p>

<p>I'm not sure what CV policy is in general on the international vagaries of English orthography, but it's hard to see merit in that kind of dredge through ancient history. If I were to wade through old answers changing "color" to "colour" I think people would rightly consider it an abuse. Please think twice before approving such trivial edits.</p>
