<p>I think I'm the OP, assuming the post in question is <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/26249/investigator-intention-and-thresholds-p-values/27195#27195">this one.</a></p>

<p>I had a question about something on John Kruschke's  "Doing Bayesian Data Analysis" slides. Two weeks later, while looking for something else entirely, I found a paper in which Dr. Kruschke discussed the topic more comprehensively. Since no one had answered the question, I wrote up a little summary and linked to the paper. I accepted it since the matter was now resolved to my satisfaction[*] and I didn't want to clutter up the unanswered queue (or look lazy with a 0% acceptance rate). Also, if I may brag, it was a pretty decent answer; I would have gladly accepted it had someone else posted it. </p>

<p>In the present case, this is all moot anyway. Last night, John Kruschke himself posted a few links to papers on that topic. Since he is undisputedly the expert on what his own slides mean, switched my "accept" to his answer instead.</p>

<p>Sorry for causing a fuss and, worse, not even noticing it was going on. I defended my dissertation yesterday(!) and have slowly been catching up on the rest of the world. </p>

<p>[*] That said, I actually would like more feedback on whether people care, or should care, about the issue raised in the original post. I guess checking "accept" does often put a damper on people's willingness to answer a question and maybe I should have held off longer. If anyone wants to post or chat about it, that'd be great.</p>
