<p>Should any tag for a distribution include that <em>-distribution</em>, or only when necessary for disambiguation?</p>

<p>For example, the following distribution tags do not include that suffix:</p>

<ul>
<li>chi-squared: <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/chi-squared" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;chi-squared&#39;" rel="tag">chi-squared</a> (even though this <em>is</em> ambiguous)</li>
<li>Gaussian (potentially ambiguous; n.b., <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/gaussian" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;gaussian&#39;" rel="tag">gaussian</a> redirects to <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/normal-distribution" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;normal-distribution&#39;" rel="tag">normal-distribution</a>)</li>
<li>Weibull: <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/weibull" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;weibull&#39;" rel="tag">weibull</a></li>
</ul>

<p>But the following do:</p>

<ul>
<li>Dirichlet-distribution: <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/dirichlet-distribution" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;dirichlet-distribution&#39;" rel="tag">dirichlet-distribution</a> (even though this not ambiguous)</li>
<li>Pareto-distribution: <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pareto-distribution" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;pareto-distribution&#39;" rel="tag">pareto-distribution</a></li>
<li>Tweedie-distribution: <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/tweedie-distribution" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;tweedie-distribution&#39;" rel="tag">tweedie-distribution</a> (not ambiguous)</li>
</ul>
