<p>As the above-mentioned moderator, I have fully explained the reasons for closing the question both times. The first time was <em>not</em> that it was off topic: as the link plainly shows, it was closed as a duplicate. You subsequently commented that you did not see how the duplicate was a duplicate--without further explanation--and I replied pointing out how it was. I am sorry that you are disappointed with the outcome, but shopping a question from one SE site to the other without addressing the issues raised is not likely to be successful.</p>

<p>In this case, one option (still) open to you is to flag the original question for migration. A better one is to consider seriously the reasons for closing it and address them first by editing the question to make it conform to SE guidelines.  (Comments on both the GIS site and this one all point to significant deficiencies that would prevent it staying open for many reasons.)</p>

<p>One option that will not work on SE is to make public <em>ad hominem</em> allegations or insinuations (as in your use of "naively"): that only incites the community to react negatively to <em>you,</em> as the violator of the site norms of discourse, and may limit its ability to consider your <em>question</em> seriously.  Although it's not easy to alienate moderators--we're used to much worse--it's a better idea to engage our support instead.</p>

<hr>

<p>By the way, you haven't actually asked a question here, so if you do not edit it soon to actually ask one, the community will soon close <em>this</em> thread, too.</p>
