<p>As @Tim says, the answer is no.  But I'm not so against interactive graphics. I can see their utility for some questions, e.g., illustrating things like paradoxes caused by endogeneity. Anytime there are issues pertaining to data in more than two dimensions, there is the possibility that interactive graphics could be helpful.  </p>

<p>Let me suggest a possible alternative:  It is possible to create and post animations (gifs) to the site as images.  (You can view some examples in @amoeba's answer to <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/a/140579/">Making sense of principal component analysis, eigenvectors &amp; eigenvalues thread</a>.)  Thus, what I would suggest is that you produce a simple animation of interacting with a graphic in a particular way to illustrate some point.  Be sure to walk through that you're doing and what it shows in the text.  You won't have the ability to allow the user to interact freely on their own and truly explore the ideas for themself, but you should be able to cover most of what you need to show; you could always post a couple of different ones, if necessary.  </p>
