<p>It would make sense for 'chatgpt' to be a synonym of 'large-language-models', as it is rather too specific. The way that would work is that 'chatgpt' would appear in the list when you look for a tag to add to a question, but what gets added is 'large-language-models'.</p>
<p>I can't say I favour the 'chatgpt-advice' tag—why not have tags for any other source of (mis)information? who on earth would want to follow them? It would seem its <em>sole</em> utility would consist in heading off some questions from being wrongly lumped together with questions about L.L.M.s, &amp; it might not even be terribly effective at that. (Furthermore, its existence might be taken as encouragement to use ChatGPT.<sup>†</sup>)</p>
<hr />
<p>† And I don't think that ought to be encouraged. Human error, as found in textbooks, blogs, lectures, &amp;c., may be instructive—offering a chance to dispel common misconceptions or suchlike—, but the same can't be said of ChatGPT's confabulations &amp; non sequiturs. I don't think there will be many cases where ChatGPT's &quot;advice&quot; is worthy of critique.</p>
