<p>Consider the following tags:</p>

<ul>
<li><p><a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/replicability" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;replicability&#39;" rel="tag">replicability</a> (4): "the extent to which subsequent studies of the same phenomenon reproduce the results obtained in the original study" (excerpt)</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/replication" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;replication&#39;" rel="tag">replication</a> (49) - no excerpt</p></li>
<li><a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/replicate" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;replicate&#39;" rel="tag">replicate</a> (7) - no excerpt</li>
</ul>

<p>The latter two tags are sometimes used to refer to replication of experiments and sometimes to "replicates" or "replication" in an ANOVA experimental design (when each ANOVA cell contains several values; e.g. see <a href="http://www.real-statistics.com/two-way-anova/two-factor-anova-with-replication/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.real-statistics.com/two-way-anova/two-factor-anova-with-replication/</a>).</p>

<p>This is confusing and I thought of tidying up these tags. My suggestion is to move all questions about replication of experiments to <code>[replicability]</code> and get rid of the other two tags altogether. I don't think we necessarily need a tag for "replicates"/"replication" in ANOVA, apart from <code>[anova]</code>, <code>[sample-size]</code>, etc.</p>

<p>Okay?</p>
