<blockquote>
<p>Should trivial edits be acceptable?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What is trivial? Not all 'trivial' edits are useless (sometimes a comma can change the entire meaning of a sentence). When it comes to review suggested-edits, use your best judgement and stick to the guidance provided in the review dialog.</p>
<p>For example, that edit should have been rejected as it changes the content from OP's post. I would have rejected as:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>clearly conflicts with author's intent</strong></p>
<p>This edit deviates from the original intent of the post. Even edits that must make drastic changes should strive to preserve the goals of the post's owner.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Other two reasons from the review dialog would also fit:</p>
<ul>
<li>'no improvement whatsoever'.</li>
<li>'attempt to reply' (should have been written as a comment).</li>
</ul>
