<p>I respect the moderators in general but this time their behaviour is just super weird to me. Please read these 2 links <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/546430/nn-embedding-similar-general-purpose-for-float-values">nn.embedding similar general purpose for float values</a> <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/546775/how-nn-embedding-algorithm-makes-embedding-vectors">how nn.Embedding algorithm makes embedding vectors</a> and I think someone not with a lot of prior knowledge can judge who is right?!
I clarified my position in comments that you can read, but to summarize:</p>
<ul>
<li>all I want a guidance to improve my question but moderators don't let proper people reach me!!!.</li>
<li>You can see my efforts to clarify my question in my question edits and in my comments trying to follow moderators instructions, trying to come up with new details and explain whatever I can, like in my 1st post I edited it a lot adding useful details, made 2nd post more clear without insisting to reopen my first post again and trying to avoid argument, so all these show I'm not here to argue.</li>
<li>ofc for a question like mine there are lot of ways to help me but one of possible one could be &quot;For discrete data there is a method named &quot;x&quot; and for continuous data I'm asking if someone have a ready code for method &quot;x&quot; in which to assimilate discretion, partition float data to periods and puts centroid of period data as a representation of that period (viola now we have a discrete like data) then uses method &quot;x&quot;, so please tell me how method &quot;x&quot; could be implemented, do u have useful sources and show me where a code like that is? btw I'm sure you know other ways of discretion of data also exists.&quot;</li>
<li>Their reason is that &quot;you don't know this method&quot; and my answer is &quot;isn't that why everyone asks a question&quot;.</li>
<li>They don't let my question to be open in the case if it really needs clarification, I would get what I should add while these moderators just enforce themselves meddling into my question not asserting &quot;what should I add&quot; while Ive done whatever I could.</li>
<li>Taking away chance to get an answer while it's obvious that someone here most likely know the answer, like <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/543324/word-embeddings-with-nn-embedding-except-glove">on my other post related to this</a> in less than 10 minute and 1.5hour I got two good answers, so again moderators insist on closure of this post is suspicious, because if someone has proper knowledge on this issue they can ask me their needs of clarifications, and I would gladly answer them.</li>
<li>They are unable to answer &quot;what should I add?&quot;, &quot;what I should focus more on&quot;, &quot;why u don't let if anyone knows that help me&quot; in countless cases, making these whole arguments not productive, they just want it closed!; all I want is please tell me what to do, they said more precise and I did whatever I could but when they r unable to convey what they want, it just senseless no matter in what position you are.</li>
<li>I admit sometimes in these arguments I was a little bit sarcastic but in my defence just follow places of such, it's always after their inabilities of clarifying their intention on insisting on it unreasonably.</li>
<li>to be brutally honest its a bit awkward people with such sophistications can't respond to a normal question like &quot;what I should add more&quot; etc and insist on their decision and while trying not to be pessimistic or accuse them cause maybe I'm wrong but it just seems they re just defending or try clean up the fault of their co-moderators</li>
</ul>
<p>I think a person with common sense knows who should give right to. but I'm open to hear your opinions. please tell me what should I do? What do you think?</p>
<p>after many people coming and checking this discussion and just upvoting my opposite opinions and downvoting me, literally no one giving the right to while I have made several points to open the my question, answering that Ive addressed their points as possible in the comment of @Tim 's answer. I'm just thinking either I'm wrong in the all of my logical cells in my brain don't help or then again the last bullet Ive mentioned here, cause people still don't answer my questions and they just support their mates. but at least a single person, I don't say fully supports me, but realizes parts of my reasons, would have been a heartwarmin.</p>
<p>if u want to be productive please just tell me about why my bullet no.3 can't or may can't be implemented? I'd like to listen just about this, if u want to make a reasonable closing reason.</p>
