<p>I voted to close as unclear when the original question was, in its entirety</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Can be a human be intellectual property ? I think and i am obtain in data
  MEta thought or is it Meta learning?</p>
  
  <p>Think about it one person thoughts being shared in as an open book, real-time feed.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>which is difficult to understand. It is ungrammatical, and the parts which I understand individually do not add up to a coherent question.</p>

<p>You've asked this question on a statistics forum, and use words like "data" and "real-time feed" and "meta learning". These are topics which are sometimes discussed on this website, so maybe you had an on-topic idea at the time that you wrote that question but articulated it poorly.</p>

<hr>

<p>In the intervening time, you've added additional text to the question. It is not clear how the question is on-topic. I also don't understand what you're asking about in the most-recent version of the question.</p>

<p>If the core question you're asking is truly "what is <strong>intellectual property</strong>?" then you're better off asking a lawyer, not a statistician.</p>
