<p>I don't see a need, at the moment, for a specific anti-A.I. policy. Stack Overflow's ChatGPT ban was a consequence of their getting so many answers wholly written by ChatGPT that they could no longer afford the time to consider each on its merits; &amp; that's not the situation we're in.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, we oughtn't to, &amp; don't, deal with low-quality content posted deliberately or negligently in the same fashion as with that posted in good faith, as an honest expression of someone's opinion. &quot;If the answers are awful, the user's credibility will suffer&quot;—no, we need to act quickly &amp; firmly to stop other users' time being wasted by computer-generated dross. And users of our site haven't volunteered to take part in an experiment—any desire on the part of developers to &quot;better train &amp; test their tool-sets&quot; must be satisfied as a by-product of constructive participation.</p>
