<p>Regarding <a href="https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11581/remote-sensing-in-geoscience">this discussion</a> that took place about 1 year ago and considering all the comments, I want to have a similar discussion here since CV is a community somehow related to remote sensing because concepts like <strong>classification</strong>, <strong>pattern recognition</strong>, <strong>PCA</strong>, <strong>fuzzy theory</strong>, <strong>ICA</strong>, <strong>change detection</strong> have a lot of applications in RS.  I suspect there are some geodesists, photogrammetrists, remote sensing experts who attend in this community to solve their problem and I want them participate in this discussion.  I think that there are concepts in remote sensing that cannot be covered just in Cross Validated + GIS and I have given some reasons <a href="https://gis.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4019/19874">here</a>, <a href="https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/q/21707/142064">here</a> and <a href="https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/q/21610/142064">here</a>.  </p>

<p><strong>So are you interested in having a new site?</strong>  </p>

<p><strong>If yes, What do you want the proposal of the site be named?</strong></p>

<p><strong>Will I have the support of some members of this community if I make a proposal for a new site or change the name of the current proposal?</strong>  </p>

<p><strong>If yes, which percent you think will commit in the new site?</strong>  </p>

<p>I just beg you that participate in the discussion. Even a small comment will be considered. I'm really confused about the name of the proposal and have some doubts about whether we really need a new site or not?</p>

<p>(Note that <a href="https://gis.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4021">a similar question</a> was asked in GIS.)  </p>

<p>Also, a chat room has been created: <a href="http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/27633/remote-sensing-experts-room">http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/27633/remote-sensing-experts-room</a></p>
