<p>The GIS SE site welcomes Remote Sensing questions <a href="https://gis.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4018/should-gis-se-be-widened-to-be-geomatics-se/4022#4022">since a long time ago</a>, and it has been explicitly made official in past years. The <a href="https://gis.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic">help center page</a> says:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Geographic Information Systems is a question and answer site for people interested in GIS, <strong>Remote Sensing</strong>, Photogrammetry, Geodesy and Surveying, as well as Programming/Databases specific to the aforementioned. It is built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&amp;A sites.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You mentioned in your question:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I think that there are concepts in remote sensing that cannot be covered just in Cross Validated + GIS and I have given some reasons here, here and here.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But I agree with <a href="https://gis.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4018/should-gis-se-be-widened-to-be-geomatics-se/4019#comment7039_4019">Devdatta Tengshe's comment</a> that all examples provided in your first link have on topic issues in GIS SE. Some of that questions would require a more focused approach or have their title rewritten, though. For example:</p>
<p>Examples of too broad questions which would need more focus:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>1- What is the most accurate algorithm to apply with use of hyperspectral data to predict soil organic matter&gt;carbon prediction and soil moisture?</p>
<p>10- How can I calibrate (or correct) my LiDAR intensity images and/or intensity values of point cloud? What should be process steps for that?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Examples in which the title would need to be rewritten so to avoid answers like: &quot;Yes, I do&quot;, &quot;No, we can't&quot;, and so on:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>3- Do you know what type of surface indicates Bowen Ratio=0.34?</p>
<p>6- Can we draw the spectral curve for a single pixel from a satellite image (for each band)?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In CV SE we have at least one related tag to RS which is <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/spatial" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;spatial&#39;" rel="tag">spatial</a> (x 475). As long as the RS questions relates to our <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic">on topic list</a> they can be asked here too.</p>
<hr />
<blockquote>
<p>So are you interested in having a new site?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry, I am not. It is already hard to keep CV SE and GIS SE organized and making them a useful repository, that more splitting of content would only bring more work to less people, without necessarily adding more quality to existing repositories.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if something is not working the way it should in one of the existing SE sites, I'd rather concentrate efforts trying to improve what is not working.</p>
