<p>Given that our site is devoted to questions and answers--and therefore is not ideal for blogging, curating collections, or other activities requiring regular contributions of material-<strong>-why don't we think instead about using material that is routinely created in the answers?</strong>  The obvious place to look is in threads tagged with <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/data-visualization">data-visualization</a>.  Look, for instance, at the many and creative contributions in the highly voted thread at <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/5278/how-to-visualize-what-anova-does">How to visualize what ANOVA does?</a>.  However, we shouldn't limit ourselves just to this tag: creative visualizations can appear almost anywhere as part of well-illustrated answers.  It's a matter of identifying them and somehow highlighting them.</p>

<p><strong>I don't think there will be such a flood of work that we need to vote on it.</strong>  If someone wants to write a blog entry about a particular visualization (or any other topic, for that matter), they are always welcome to do so.</p>

<p><strong>This sort of stuff almost writes itself:</strong> the blog posts, which do not have to appear routinely but only in response to great contributions on our main site, only have to point out interesting visualizations and explain why they are worth attention and study.</p>
