<p>ChatGPT and similar large language models (LLMs) will revolutionise tech support. I  worked as a support engineer in the past, and I am <em>certain</em> it will happen as a good chunk of tech support questions are just &quot;careful definitions and links to documentation&quot;. Are some of our question like that too? Let's face it, they are. Is a ChatGPT-like system therefore &quot;good&quot; for those answers? Yes. Should it be used? I want to say no because for me CV.SE is like a game, there is an exchange of curiosity and knowledge. I wouldn't play a pub quiz against someone using Google search and similarly I would think that using LLMs on CV.SE is cheating at best, trolling at worst. So, yeah, nuke those answers. The answers in the thread: <em><a href="https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/974/">What motivates people to answer questions?</a></em> exemplify how a ChatGPT-like  system can be problematic and very distruptive for communities like CV.SE.</p>
