<p>This could be generalized to other sources beyond chatgpt, for instance</p>
<p>&quot;Y told me X,&quot;</p>
<p>with Y being chatGPT, quora, reddit, google, online course etc.</p>
<hr />
<p>Chatgpt is just a current instance of a language learning model or 'online oracle'. In the future we may have additional names from chatGPT rivals like Google's bard, and who knows Amazon is gonna come up with a third version as well.</p>
<p>A more generic name might be welcome. Potentially we can keep a tag chatGPT for the moment as an alias for the more general term.</p>
<p>Aside from this, it may not seem like GPT is gonna be used as an important resource for statistics advice. Tagging potential questions that have specifically chatGPT as a source might be a bit exaggerated and is giving this source of information more attention in the tags than needed. Rather than making a separate tag, to lure away users from wrongly using a tag, it might be better to discourage the use of the currently existing chatGPT tag for such problems.</p>
<hr />
<p>The same is true for the first description of the chatgpt tag. This is more like a language learning topic. The chatGPT is just currently a hype but doesn't seem to require a special tag (except as an alias to help people find the correct language learning tag)</p>
