<p>As someone who knows little about statistics I try to contribute here on Meta to repay what I learn on the main site.</p>

<p>Looking only on your <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/261468/how-to-deal-with-outliers-in-dependent-variables/261503#261503">newest answer</a>: I did not learn much from it. It is just pointing towards external references, failing to be a self-contained answer. You mention a paper of yours, but do not provide a reference; how should anyone know which paper you are talking about?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I have written some answers that are short, concise and accurate.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>To me that answer is not concise, because it leaves a gap between the question and what the answer might be. Therefore, some users will understand that type of answer as 'very-low-quality' and will flag it for peer-review.</p>

<p>I don't know how the process of hanging notices work, but I guess if the answer is peer reviewed as low quality, it is that (notice) or deletion.</p>

<p>Now, on a more subjective ground; because you are a high reputation user, and have shown yourself to know statistics, the expectations on your participation are high as a matter of quality and didactics, to me, at least.</p>
