<p>Expand the definition of "low quality" enough to cover the low quality posts? Currently "Very low quality (i.e. no amount of editing can salvage the post) (only new posts scoring 0 or less)" Right now, we are throwing out stuff that has value, mislabeling low quality as "too broad" or "unclear." The worse effect is upon the OP whose post is inexplicable mischaracterized which misdirects the OP's corrective action. </p>
