<p>Without moderator action (I'm not clear on all the required steps), nothing is going to happen to the <code>[homogeneity]</code> tag.  You do make a compelling argument for changing the existing tag to <code>[homogeneity-of-variance]</code>, and then making <em>that</em> a synonym of <code>[heteroscedasticity]</code>, but that also seems like it might be more trouble than it's worth.  </p>

<p>Instead, if you have another, specific kind of homogeneity that you think merits a tag (e.g., <code>[time-series-homogeneity]</code>--possibly with a better name ;-), then why not create such a tag directly?  </p>
